Expose 9/11

Because 9/11 Was An Inside Job

Why Question 9/11?

This website was just launched on June 1st, 2015. Over the next several days and weeks, I will be adding links and resources to this website to make a compelling case that we were lied to about 9/11. I have came to that conclusion with a heavy heart.

I’ve had questions about the events of 9/11 since almost the morning of 9/11. I pay attention to, and read about, current events. Information surrounding 9/11 was revealed on a piecemeal basis and some of the information would prompt questions.

Being informed has not been beneficial or advantageous to me. I have gained and benefited nothing by questioning 9/11. To the contrary, since many people would rather accept the government’s official story, I have probably lost career opportunities. At the same time, knowing what I know, I would be intellectually dishonest to not question the official 9/11 story.

At times, I have had my motives called into question. I’ve had my patriotism called into question, yet I question 9/11 because I care about my country. I have been called names – at times, by my own family. I am not ashamed for speaking truth. I am not ashamed for opposing murdering terrorists. That’s why I decided to create this website.

This is meant to be a simple to navigate website that will offer links and resources to help you understand why I question 9/11 and why you should question 9/11 as well. I answer some common points of attack on efforts to expose 9/11 truth.

As an example, people like to use the term “conspiracy theorist” in a derogatory way, applying the term exclusively to those who question the official story about 9/11. But unless you believe mother nature brought down the World Trade Center on 9/11, then you, too, are a conspiracy theorist. Why? The official story is a conspiracy theory – i.e., the theory that rebels from caves in Afghanistan conspired to knock down the World Trade Center.

No. I don’t blame everybody in government. There are some bad people and there are good people in government. One refrain I have heard is there is no way the government – or, more precisely, an element embedded within the government – could have done 9/11 without everybody knowing about it, and to say that 9/11 was an inside job would require blaming the entire government.

That refrain is totally wrong. If you believe 19 amateurs could have done 9/11, why would it be impossible to believe that a different group of 19 men, embedded within the most powerful government on earth, couldn’t have done 9/11?

Furthermore, the refrain that 9/11 couldn’t have been an inside job because people would have known is wrong. Good people and whistleblowers in government have came forward, so there are people who know that what we have been told about 9/11 isn’t true.

I didn’t ask to be in the position of questioning 9/11. I do not enjoy having questions about 9/11. I ended up in this position because my own personal circumstances in juxtaposition with my conscience and love for my country compel me to question 9/11.

How so? I served for four years on active duty in the Marine Corps infantry honorably. Shortly before my End of Active Service date, which was in June of 1999, I had to receive the first three shots of the anthrax vaccine series. My unit’s policy was to make us take the shots even if we were about to get out.

I was so close to getting out of the Marine Corps when I had to receive the anthrax vaccine that two out of three of the shots I received were administered posterior to my final physical. There’s nothing in my military medical records about health problems from the anthrax vaccine. I didn’t get out on a medical. I received a very nice letter of recommendation from my Company First Sgt.

I was planning on re-enlisting in the Reserves right off of active duty, but my First Sgt. wanted me to re-enlist on active duty.  In a spirit of friendliness, my First Sgt. gave me a difficult time about going to see the career planner to re-enlist in the Reserves. I decided I would re-enlist after coming home while still in the IRR. But my treatment from the VA medical system prompted me to abandon the idea altogether.

Right as I got out of the Marine Corps, I ended up with health problems that began just posterior to receiving the anthrax vaccine. The Department of Veterans Affairs medical system has not only not been helpful, but has been an obstacle in getting those health problems treated. The VA medical system has lied about me in a plurality of instances – some of the lies more serious than others – and never corrected those lies as far as I’m aware. I have had to go outside of the VA medical system to get my health problems treated. The VA is a criminal organization.

I am far from the only one who has endured problems from the anthrax vaccine. Because of the damage that vaccine was inflicting on the health of the troops, the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program was halted in the year 2000. I devoted a great portion of my life to exposing the dangers of that vaccine because I care about those serving in the military. It has been a thankless effort, as no good deed goes unpunished.

Because of my experience with the anthrax vaccine, I have followed the developments of the anthrax attack very closely. How many people even remember the anthrax attack and are cognizant of the anthrax attack that took place adjacent to 9/11?

That anthrax attack was used as the pretext to rejuvenate the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program. Yet it turns out, pursuant to the government’s own story, the culprit was a Department of Defense scientist who worked on the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program named Bruce Ivins.

But there’s something else. If you look more closely at the anthrax attack, you would find a nexus between the anthrax attack and 9/11.  If those two are, indeed, nexused with one another, which I believe I can demonstrate, then that should prompt a question: How is it the anthrax attack was, admittedly, an inside job, but 9/11 wasn’t? See: http://expose911.com/category/evidenceandanomalies/anthraxattack/

I do not run around saying that 9/11 was an inside job lightly nor for effect. I don’t say it because I like to complain. I don’t say it because I’m angry. I say it because I believe it to be true. I believe it to be true because I have taken time to look at and analyze information very carefully. At the same time, I want only the truth. If the truth were that Osama bin Laden is responsible for 9/11, I would accept that.

Given my personal experiences, I’m uncertain how anybody could expect me to not have questions about 9/11. And if 9/11 was an inside job – not incompetence, but misfeasance – what, other than calling for accountability, is the most moral and appropriate response? Therefore, I call for the prompt arrest and prosecution of all 9/11 perpetrators, whoever they may be. Any others who have played a role in obstructing justice by covering up 9/11 must also be held accountable. If that means President Barack Obama as well as President George W. Bush be arrested for the sake of justice, then so be it. I’m opposed to amnesty for war criminals. I’m opposed to Washington, D.C., being a sanctuary city for mega criminals.

As a Christian, I have a duty to stand for truth. Failing to stand for truth would make me complicit in a lie. There is no in between God and the Devil. If you are not for God, then you are for the Devil. I choose God. I refuse to suppress the truth in unrighteousness. I choose compassion over indifference. I care about humanity.

I believe that as I add links and information to this site, you, too, will find reason to question 9/11. And if 9/11 was an inside job, then it is our duty to alert our fellow countrymen.

When I enlisted in the Marine Corps, I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution. That oath means something to me. Only by exposing who the real terrorists are can we prevent future acts of terrorism. The only way to end the terror program peacefully is not by self-censoring, but by speaking truth. We should be prepared at all times to defend our beliefs by getting 9/11 truth in order. The machinations of tyranny must be exposed and thrown off. That’s why I put this website together.

Exclusive: The Informant Who Lived With The Hijackers

In this story, we learn that at least some of the alleged hijackers – the same ones brought into the country by the CIA and funded by Bush’s friends in the highest levels of Saudi government – lived with FBI informants. To me, this fits more closely with the theory that the alleged hijackers were patsies.

See: http://web.archive.org/web/20161001235546/http://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-informant-who-lived-hijackers-144439

Bin Laden family allowed 9/11 leave

Right after 9/11, while nobody else could fly because flights were grounded, bin Laden family members were allowed to fly out of the country. It seems to me that normal police work would involve questioning the relatives of the person who allegedly carried out the worst terror attack on U.S. soil in history.

See: http://web.archive.org/web/20161001235546/http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2003/09/02/Bin_Laden_family_allowed_911_leave/UPI-37121062555254/

See: http://web.archive.org/web/20161001235546/http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Bin-Laden-s-relatives-made-a-first-class-escape-2859127.php

George Bush, Sr., had breakfast with Shafig bin Laden on 9/11

On the very morning of 9/11, George Bush, Sr., had breakfast at a Carlyle Group meeting that was also attended by Shafig bin Laden – bother of Osama bin Laden.

See (very last paragraph): http://web.archive.org/web/20161001235546/http://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2002/jun/16/features.magazine57

See: http://web.archive.org/web/20161001235546/http://www.denverpost.com/rodriguez/ci_4319898

FBI probes possible Saudi, 9/11 money ties

The alleged hijackers, most likely patsies, were funded by high ranking Saudis who have been very close with the Bush family. Prince Bandar even met with George W. Bush right after 9/11.

Where I would be very careful about going too far down this road is that the alleged hijackers, all part of a very sophisticated intelligence operation that was probably planned for several years, if not decades, are a diversion. The trail left by the alleged hijackers seems to be deliberate. It diverts attention away from how there probably were no hijackers and the most likely mastermind of 9/11 is Dick Cheney.

Do you really believe the U.S. government would cover up 9/11 for Saudi Arabia? The funding for the patsies would have been through foreign proxies as a way to maintain plausible deniability.

See: http://www.newsweek.com/saudi-money-trail-140813

See: http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/11/23/saudi.fbi.911/

See: http://nypost.com/2013/12/15/inside-the-saudi-911-coverup/

The Road to 9/11: Wealth, Empire, and the Future of America

This is an ambitious, meticulous examination of how U.S. foreign policy since the 1960s has led to partial or total cover-ups of past domestic criminal acts, including, perhaps, the catastrophe of 9/11. Peter Dale Scott, whose previous books have investigated CIA involvement in southeast Asia, the drug wars, and the Kennedy assassination, here probes how the policies of presidents since Nixon have augmented the tangled bases for the 2001 terrorist attack. Scott shows how America’s expansion into the world since World War II has led to momentous secret decision making at high levels. He demonstrates how these decisions by small cliques are responsive to the agendas of private wealth at the expense of the public, of the democratic state, and of civil society. He shows how, in implementing these agendas, U.S. intelligence agencies have become involved with terrorist groups they once backed and helped create, including al Qaeda.

Eyewitnesses didn’t see a commercial airliner

If you believe suspecting the use of drone aircraft is the byproduct of loose thinking, think again. It’s not only important that the evidence corroborates the theory, but that the theory corroborates the evidence. I stick with eyewitness testimony that corroborates the rest of the evidence. Eyewitnesses saw something other than a commercial airliner. Watch the clip below in its entirety.


Was the first World Trade Center attack a false flag operation?

Was the first World Trade Center attack in 1993 a false flag operation? It appears that the FBI had foreknowledge of the attack and actually helped make the bomb.


See: http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/27/nyregion/tapes-in-bombing-plot-show-informer-and-fbi-at-odds.html

See: http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/28/nyregion/tapes-depict-proposal-to-thwart-bomb-used-in-trade-center-blast.html

See: http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/31/nyregion/bomb-informer-s-tapes-give-rare-glimpse-of-fbi-dealings.html

See: http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/chicagotribune/doc/283660292.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Dec%2015,%201993&author=From%20Tribune%20Wires.&pub=Chicago%20Tribune%20(pre-1997%20Fulltext)&edition=&startpage=7&desc=FBI’S%20TIPSTER%20SAID%20HE%20BUILT%20N.Y.%20BOMB

See: http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/doc/282123055.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Oct%2028,%201993&author=&pub=Los%20Angeles%20Times%20(pre-1997%20Fulltext)&edition=&startpage=21&desc=Paper%20Says%20FBI%20Blocked%20Plan%20to%20Foil%20N.Y.%20Blast

See: http://pdr.autono.net/WhoBombedWTC.html

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emad_Salem

Career Army Specialist sues Rumsfeld, Cheney, saying no evacuation order given on 9/11

I understand a Specialist is most likely not somebody who has spent a career in the military, but I use the title straight from the article and that’s besides the point. The issue is that the Pentagon wasn’t evacuated despite the FAA notifying NEADS of incoming aircraft around 15 minutes before impact. While the Pentagon wasn’t evacuated, the National Reconnaissance Office, the agency which operates surveillance satellites and could have maybe actually seen what hit the Pentagon, was evacuated. In what way did the evacuation of NRO impact our surveillance capabilities that morning?

See: http://rawstory.com/news/2008/911_survivor_blasts_Rumsfeld_Cheney_No_1217.html

See: http://expose911.com/u-s-agencys-strange-9ll-coincidence/

Pentagon, a Vulnerable Building, Was Hit in Least Vulnerable Spot

The Pentagon was struck in the exact and only part (i.e. Wedge One) that had been undergoing renovations which were completed, or neared completion, on the very morning of 9/11.

Curiously, it was the exact opposite side as the side that housed senior leaders. The renovations made that part of the Pentagon the only part with blast resistant windows and a sprinkler system. It was ostensibly the safest part of the Pentagon. If that was the safest part of the Pentagon, why did none of the senior leaders seek shelter in that part of the Pentagon?

See: http://articles.latimes.com/2001/sep/16/news/mn-46435

See: http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/renovation.html

See: http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/location.html

9/11 predicted on episode of Lone Gunmen

Six months before 9/11, an episode of the Lone Gunmen, which aired on FOX, depicted a rogue faction within the government remotely hijacking a commercial airliner to fly it into the World Trade Center under the cover of war games and as a pretext to boost the military industrial complex. The star of the show, Dean Haglund, has even gone public suggesting that the CIA dropped the script on the producer of the show. What this does is serve as a discrediting mechanism, because when somebody suggests that scenario really took place on 9/11 itself, as evidence suggests, people can say that person got it from a movie. So depicting 9/11 on a television show before 9/11 fictionalizes the truth.


U.S. agency’s strange 9/ll coincidence

The real story from this isn’t just that different parts of the government were doing drills very similar to what actually happened on 9/11, but that the National Reconnaissance Office sent its employees home when the real world events of 9/11 began to occur.

Think about this more carefully. The National Reconnaissance Office operates surveillance satellites which could have been used to monitor the Pentagon. In what way did the drills of the National Reconnaissance Office curtail surveillance of the Pentagon? Was the National Reconnaissance Office evacuated anterior to the Pentagon being hit?

If so, doesn’t it seem awkward that the Pentagon wasn’t evacuated despite the FAA notifying NEADS of incoming aircraft 15 minutes before impact, but the National Reconnaissance Office, which is the one agency that could have seen what actually hit the Pentagon, was evacuated before the Pentagon was hit?

See: http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Security-Industry/2002/08/22/US-agencys-strange-9ll-coincidence/70461030045607/

See: http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2002-08-22-sept-11-plane-drill-_x.htm

See: http://www.boston.com/news/packages/sept11/anniversary/wire_stories/0903_plane_exercise.htm

Did the FBI sabotage the Amerithrax investigation?

Pursuant to the FBI agent in charge of the Amerithrax investigation, Richard Lambert, FBI leadership impeded the investigation and stove piped the flow of information. Why would the FBI have sabotaged the Amerithrax investigation?

See: http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/04/18/anthrax-coverup-exposed-paul-craig-Roberts/

See: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/04/head-fbis-anthrax-investigation-calls-b-s.html

See: http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1714250-former-fbi-special-agent-in-charge-richard.html

Experts See F.B.I. Missteps Hampering Anthrax Inquiry

In this article, we are told about the government having the Ames strain of anthrax destroyed which would make it harder to trace the anthrax used in the attack back to its origin. We also learn in this article that, somehow, the way to “prevent” terrorism would be for the FBI to tap lawyer-client conversations. That would more likely allow the FBI to manage patsies. The only way it would help solve the anthrax attack is if the FBI tapped Dick Cheney’s conversations with all of his aides and lawyers.

See: http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/09/us/nation-challenged-inquiry-experts-see-fbi-missteps-hampering-anthrax-inquiry.html

Rudy Giuliani goes to Florida to decontaminate building

Of all the people in the world, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani got the contract to decontaminate the building that was hit with anthrax. One of the first things the government did after the anthrax attack was order all of the Ames strain of anthrax destroyed, which would have made it much harder to do genetic testing in order to determine the origin of the anthrax that was used in the attack. Was Giuliani there to decontaminate the building or help destroy evidence?

See: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/giuliani-co-cleaning-up-anthrax/

See: http://www.heraldtribune.com/news/20040114/giuliani-firm-to-occupy-fla-anthrax-building

See: http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2004-01-14/news/0401140190_1_ami-building-brentwood-postal-facility-giuliani-partners

See: http://www.giulianipartners.com/press_bioone_011304.aspx

Larry Klayman on the White House being on Cipro

Larry Klayman, himself a former Department of Justice official, believes the White House had foreknowledge of the anthrax attack. Keep in mind the attack was allegedly carried out by a scientist in the employ of the government pursuant to the government itself. And let me make clear that the White House didn’t take the anthrax shots, but was on the antibiotic Cipro before the anthrax attack.


See: http://www.newsgarden.org/columns/anthrax/cipro.shtml

The hijackers had no way of knowing about the tabloid connection

On this one you need to scroll down and read the remarks about how the alleged hijackers had no way of knowing about the nexus between the lady who rented them apartments and the tabloid paper that was hit by anthrax. This prompts the question: Who selected the targets? I don’t believe it was Bruce Ivins who selected those targets.

See: http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=gloria_irish_1

Since this was posted, that page was taken down, so you have to see the archived page.

See: http://web.archive.org/web/20140730183712/http://historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=gloria_irish_1

Hijackers linked to tabloid

The information contained in this article is key, because it contains the nexus between the anthrax attack and the 9/11 attack. Keep in mind that the anthrax attack took place after 9/11, which means, following the government’s own conspiracy theory, the alleged hijackers were all dead. But I would say the mistake is to assume that what we’ve been told about 9/11 was true and that there were indeed hijackers.

Like I’ve said over and over, if the anthrax attack was an inside job – which it was pursuant to the government itself – and if it was nexused with 9/11, then how was 9/11 not an inside job?

I believe that when all the information is collected and amalgamated, the only scenario that makes sense is the alleged hijackers were patsies and that the planes were remotely piloted drones.

This article tells us that one of the targets that was hit by anthrax in Florida was a building occupied by a media publication edited by a man whose wife rented apartments to the alleged hijackers. The government calls it a big “coincidence”. If it wasn’t a “coincidence”, then there’s a problem – a major problem.

See: http://www.sptimes.com/News/101501/Worldandnation/Hijackers_linked_to_t.shtml

See: http://edition.cnn.com/2001/HEALTH/conditions/10/15/anthrax.hijackers/

See: http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/attack/2001/10/15/anthrax-wife.htm

See: http://www.foxnews.com/story/2001/10/15/tabloid-editor-wife-rented-apartments-to-two-hijackers.html

FBI was told to blame Anthrax scare on Al Qaeda by White House officials

Pursuant to an aide to the former head of the FBI, Robert Mueller, the White House (particularly Cheney and his henchmen) tried to pressure the FBI into blaming the anthrax attack on al Qa’eda anterior to any investigation whatsoever. That alone is totally criminal, and it debunks the belief that the Bush administration was above blaming a terrorist attack that was, pursuant to the government itself, an inside job on some other enemy as a pretext to go to war. Was the Bush administration blaming an attack like 9/11 on a foreign enemy as a pretext to go to war? Well, they wanted to do it for the anthrax attack.

See: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/fbi-told-blame-anthrax-scare-al-qaeda-white-house-officials-article-1.312733

Anthrax Bruce Ivins Wins Highest Civilian Award From Defense Dept. In March, 2003

Bruce Ivins received the highest civilian award the Army has to offer almost two years after he allegedly carried out the anthrax attack. He was given the award by the Dick Cheney acolyte, former Army Brigadier General, Enron executive, Secretary of the Army, Thomas White.

See: http://crooksandliars.com/2008/08/07/anthrax-bruce-ivins-wins-highest-civilian-award-from-defense-dept-in-march-2003

Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil

The attacks of September 11, 2001, were accomplished through an amazing orchestration of logistics and personnel. Crossing the Rubicon discovers and identifies key suspects—finding some of them in the highest echelons of American government—by showing how they acted in concert to guarantee that the attacks produced the desired result.

Crossing the Rubicon is unique not only for its case-breaking examination of 9/11, but for the breadth and depth of its world picture—an interdisciplinary analysis of petroleum, geopolitics, narcotraffic, intelligence and militarism—without which 9/11 cannot be understood.

The US manufacturing sector has been mostly replaced by speculation on financial data whose underlying economic reality is a dark secret. Hundreds of billions of dollars in laundered drug money flow through Wall Street each year from opium and coca fields maintained by CIA-sponsored warlords and US-backed covert paramilitary violence. America’s global dominance depends on a continually turning mill of guns, drugs, oil and money. Oil and natural gas—the fuels that make economic growth possible—are subsidized by American military force and foreign lending.

In reality, 9/11 and the resulting “war on terror” are parts of a massive authoritarian response to an emerging economic crisis of unprecedented scale. Peak Oil—the beginning of the end for our industrial civilization—is driving the élites of American power to implement unthinkably draconian measures of repression, warfare and population control. Crossing the Rubicon is more than a story. It is a map of the perilous terrain through which, together and alone, we are all now making our way.

Michael C. Ruppert is the publisher and editor of From the Wilderness, a newsletter read by more than 16,000 subscribers in 40 countries. A former Los Angeles Police Department narcotics investigator, he is widely known for his groundbreaking stories on US involvement in the drug trade, Peak Oil and 9/11.

9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA

The authoritative work on 9/11 and state-sponsored false-flag terrorism. 9/11 Synthetic Terror is the only book to present a working model for the event – a network of moles, patsies, paramilitary pros, privatized intelligence assets and corrupt media corporations. We see how this enormous provocation was successfully executed and exploited as war propaganda.

This new, fifth edition reveals a whole new dimension of explosive facts for the first time: the enormous array of drills in which the US defense apparatus rehearsed every aspect of the 9/11 operation. Author Webster Tarpley presents the corpus of 9/11 research – such as the controlled demolition of the three WTC towers – from the perspective of a veteran intelligence expert and historian. The exploit is placed in the geopolitical context of oligarchy and imperialism – in the tradition of precedents such as the Gunpowder Plot, the USS Maine, the Strategy of Tension, and other historically decisive state-sponsored terror subterfuges.

9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, Vol. 1

Were the military and the FAA really that incompetent? Were our intelligence-gathering agencies really in the dark about 9/11? How could so much go wrong at once, in the world’s strongest and most technologically sophisticated country? Both the government and the mainstream media have tried to portray the 9/11 truth movement as led by people who can be dismissed as “conspiracy theorists.” This volume shows this caricature to be untrue. Coming from different academic disciplines as well as from different parts of the world, the authors are united In the conviction that the official story about 9/11 is a huge deception manufactured to extend Imperial control at home and abroad.

Christian Faith and the Truth behind 9/11: A Call to Reflection and Action

Probing disturbing questions that beg for a response from the Christian community, distinguished scholar of religion and popular writer David Ray Griffin provides a hard-hitting analysis of the official accounts of the events of September 11, 2001. A tireless investigator, Griffin has sorted through enormous amounts of government and independent data and brought to the surface some very unsettling inconsistencies about what really happened. In this, his latest book, he analyzes the evidence on 9/11 and then explores a distinctively Christian perspective on these issues, taking seriously what we know about Jesus’ life, death, and teachings. Drawing a parallel between the Roman Empire of antiquity and the American Empire of today, he applies Jesus’ teachings to the current political administration, and he explores how Christian churches, as a community intending to be an incarnation of the divine, can and should respond.

Expose 9/11 © 2016 Frontier Theme