Why Question 9/11?

This website was just launched on June 1st, 2015. Over the next several days and weeks, I will be adding links and resources to this website to make a compelling case that we were lied to about 9/11. I have came to that conclusion with a heavy heart.

I’ve had questions about the events of 9/11 since almost the morning of 9/11. I pay attention to, and read about, current events. Information surrounding 9/11 was revealed on a piecemeal basis and some of the information would prompt questions.

Being informed has not been beneficial or advantageous to me. I have gained and benefited nothing by questioning 9/11. To the contrary, since many people would rather accept the government’s official story, I have probably lost career opportunities. At the same time, knowing what I know, I would be intellectually dishonest to not question the official 9/11 story.

At times, I have had my motives called into question. I’ve had my patriotism called into question, yet I question 9/11 because I care about my country. I have been called names – at times, by my own family. I am not ashamed for speaking truth. I am not ashamed for opposing murdering terrorists. That’s why I decided to create this website.

This is meant to be a simple to navigate website that will offer links and resources to help you understand why I question 9/11 and why you should question 9/11 as well. I answer some common points of attack on efforts to expose 9/11 truth.

As an example, people like to use the term “conspiracy theorist” in a derogatory way, applying the term exclusively to those who question the official story about 9/11. But unless you believe mother nature brought down the World Trade Center on 9/11, then you, too, are a conspiracy theorist. Why? The official story is a conspiracy theory – i.e., the theory that rebels from caves in Afghanistan conspired to knock down the World Trade Center.

No. I don’t blame everybody in government. There are some bad people and there are good people in government. One refrain I have heard is there is no way the government – or, more precisely, an element embedded within the government – could have done 9/11 without everybody knowing about it, and to say that 9/11 was an inside job would require blaming the entire government.

That refrain is totally wrong. If you believe 19 amateurs could have done 9/11, why would it be impossible to believe that a different group of 19 men, embedded within the most powerful government on earth, couldn’t have done 9/11?

Furthermore, the refrain that 9/11 couldn’t have been an inside job because people would have known is wrong. Good people and whistleblowers in government have came forward, so there are people who know that what we have been told about 9/11 isn’t true.

I didn’t ask to be in the position of questioning 9/11. I do not enjoy having questions about 9/11. I ended up in this position because my own personal circumstances in juxtaposition with my conscience and love for my country compel me to question 9/11.

How so? I served for four years on active duty in the Marine Corps infantry honorably. Shortly before my End of Active Service date, which was in June of 1999, I had to receive the first three shots of the anthrax vaccine series. My unit’s policy was to make us take the shots even if we were about to get out.

I was so close to getting out of the Marine Corps when I had to receive the anthrax vaccine that two out of three of the shots I received were administered posterior to my final physical. There’s nothing in my military medical records about health problems from the anthrax vaccine. I didn’t get out on a medical. I received a very nice letter of recommendation from my Company First Sgt.

I was planning on re-enlisting in the Reserves right off of active duty, but my First Sgt. wanted me to re-enlist on active duty.  In a spirit of friendliness, my First Sgt. gave me a difficult time about going to see the career planner to re-enlist in the Reserves. I decided I would re-enlist after coming home while still in the IRR. But my treatment from the VA medical system prompted me to abandon the idea altogether.

Right as I got out of the Marine Corps, I ended up with health problems that began just posterior to receiving the anthrax vaccine. The Department of Veterans Affairs medical system has not only not been helpful, but has been an obstacle in getting those health problems treated. The VA medical system has lied about me in a plurality of instances – some of the lies more serious than others – and never corrected those lies as far as I’m aware. I have had to go outside of the VA medical system to get my health problems treated.

I am far from the only one who has endured problems from the anthrax vaccine. Because of the damage that vaccine was inflicting on the health of the troops, the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program was halted in the year 2000. I devoted a great portion of my life to exposing the dangers of that vaccine because I care about those serving in the military. It has been a thankless effort, as no good deed goes unpunished.

Because of my experience with the anthrax vaccine, I have followed the developments of the anthrax attack very closely. How many people even remember the anthrax attack and are cognizant of the anthrax attack that took place adjacent to 9/11?

That anthrax attack was used as the pretext to rejuvenate the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program. Yet it turns out, pursuant to the government’s own story, the culprit was a Department of Defense scientist who worked on the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program named Bruce Ivins.

But there’s something else. If you look more closely at the anthrax attack, you would find a nexus between the anthrax attack and 9/11.  If those two are, indeed, nexused with one another, which I believe I can demonstrate, then that should prompt a question: How is it the anthrax attack was, admittedly, an inside job, but 9/11 wasn’t? See: http://expose911.com/category/evidenceandanomalies/anthraxattack/

I do not run around saying that 9/11 was an inside job lightly nor for effect. I don’t say it because I like to complain. I don’t say it because I’m angry. I say it because I believe it to be true. I believe it to be true because I have taken time to look at and analyze information very carefully.

Given my personal experiences, I’m uncertain how anybody could expect me to not have questions about 9/11. And if 9/11 was an inside job – not incompetence, but misfeasance – what, other than calling for accountability, is the most moral and appropriate response?

As a Christian, I have a duty to stand for truth. Failing to stand for truth would make me complicit in a lie. There is no in between God and the Devil. If you are not for God, then you are for the Devil. I choose God. I refuse to suppress the truth in unrighteousness.

I believe that as I add links and information to this site, you, too, will find reason to question 9/11. And if 9/11 was an inside job, then it is our duty to alert our fellow countrymen.

When I enlisted in the Marine Corps, I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution. That oath means something to me. Only by exposing who the real terrorists are can we prevent future acts of terrorism. The only way to end the terror program peacefully is not by self-censoring, but by speaking truth. We should be prepared at all times to defend our beliefs by getting 9/11 truth in order. That’s why I put this website together.

Did the FBI sabotage the Amerithrax investigation?

Pursuant to the FBI agent in charge of the Amerithrax investigation, Richard Lambert, FBI leadership impeded the investigation and stove piped the flow of information. Why would the FBI have sabotaged the Amerithrax investigation?

See: http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/04/18/anthrax-coverup-exposed-paul-craig-Roberts/

See: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/04/head-fbis-anthrax-investigation-calls-b-s.html

See: http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1714250-former-fbi-special-agent-in-charge-richard.html

The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11


See larger image

Additional Images:

The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11


Features: the first closely reasoned factual basis for 9/11 conspiracy
By (author): David Ray Griffin, Richard Falk

Taking to heart the idea that those who benefit from a crime ought to be investigated, here the eminent theologian David Ray Griffin sifts through the evidence about the attacks of 9/11 – stories from the mainstream press, reports from abroad, the work of other researchers, and the contradictory words of members of the Bush administration themselves – and finds that, taken together, they cast serious doubt on the official story of that tragic day
List Price: $18.00 USD
New From: $4.77 USD In Stock
Used from: $0.01 USD In Stock

Taking to heart the idea that those who benefit from a crime ought to be investigated, here the eminent theologian David Ray Griffin sifts through the evidence about the attacks of 9/11 – stories from the mainstream press, reports from abroad, the work of other researchers, and the contradictory words of members of the Bush administration themselves – and finds that, taken together, they cast serious doubt on the official story of that tragic day

Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory

Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory


By (author): David Ray Griffin

By virtue of his previous four books on the subject, David Ray Griffin is widely recognized as one of the leading spokespersons of the 9/11 truth movement, which rejects the official conspiracy theory about 9/11. Although this movement was long ignored by the US government and the mainstream media, recent polls have shown that the rejection of the official theory has become a mainstream political phenomenon. No longer ignoring the 9/11 truth movement, the government and the corporately controlled media have released a flurry of stories and reports aimed at debunking it. In the present book, David Ray Griffin shows that these attempts can themselves be easily debunked. Besides demonstrating the pitiful failure of Debunking 9/11 Myths (published by Popular Mechanics and endorsed by Senator John McCain), Griffin riddles recent reports and stories put out by the US Department of State, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the New York Times, and others. He responds to criticisms of these efforts and shows that the charge that is regularly leveled against critics of the official theory–that they employ irrational and unscientific methods to defend conclusions based on faith–actually applies more to those who defend the official theory.
List Price: $20.00 USD
New From: $5.93 USD In Stock
Used from: $0.01 USD In Stock

By virtue of his previous four books on the subject, David Ray Griffin is widely recognized as one of the leading spokespersons of the 9/11 truth movement, which rejects the official conspiracy theory about 9/11. Although this movement was long ignored by the US government and the mainstream media, recent polls have shown that (as Time magazine has acknowledged) the rejection of the official theory has become “a mainstream political phenomenon.” It is not surprising, therefore, that the government and the corporately controlled media have shifted tactics. No longer ignoring the 9/11 truth movement, they have released a flurry of stories and reports aimed at debunking it.

In the present book, David Ray Griffin shows that these attempts can themselves be easily debunked. Besides demonstrating the pitiful failure of Debunking 9/11 Myths (published by Popular Mechanics and endorsed by Senator John McCain), Griffin riddles recent reports and stories put out by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the New York Times, Vanity Fair, and Time magazine as well as a new book by the chairmen of the 9/11 Commission. He also responds to criticisms of the 9/11 truth movement by left-leaning and Christian publications–which one might have expected to be supportive.

Throughout these critiques, Griffin shows that the charge that is regularly leveled against critics of the official theory-that they employ irrational and unscientific methods to defend conclusions based on faith-actually applies more fully to those who defend the official theory.

This book, by debunking the most prevalent attempts to refute the evidence cited by the 9/11 truth movement, shows that this movement’s central claim-that 9/11 was an inside job-remains the only explanation that fits the facts.

The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False


See larger image

Additional Images:

The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False


Features: Used Book in Good Condition
By (author): David Ray Griffin

At 5:20 in the afternoon on 9/11, Building 7 of the World Trade Center collapsed, even though it had not been struck by a plane and had fires on only a few floors. The reason for its collapse was considered a mystery. In August 2008, NIST (the National Institute of Standards and Technology) issued its report on WTC 7, declaring that “the reason for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery” and that “science is really behind what we have said.” Showing that neither of these claims is true, David Ray Griffin demonstrates that NIST is guilty of the most serious types of scientific fraud: fabricating, falsifying, and ignoring evidence. He also shows that NIST’s report left intact the central mystery: How could a building damaged by fire–not explosives–have come down in free fall?

“David Ray Griffin has provided a comprehensive dismantling of NIST’s theory about WTC 7, according to which it suffered global collapse because of ordinary building fires. Besides showing that NIST committed massive scientific fraud, Griffin also points out that NIST was able to complete its theory only by affirming a miracle: a steel-framed high-rise building coming down in free fall even though explosives had not been used to remove its columns.”–Richard Gage, member of American Institute of Architects; founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

“A definitive study of what happens when political concerns are permitted to override science and the scientific method. With intellectual finesse worthy of a scientist, Griffin shows that NIST’s WTC 7 report has no scientific credibility. A must read for all concerned with the restoration of science to its `rightful place’ in our democracy.”–John D. Wyndham, Ph.D., Physics, Cambridge University; former Research Fellow at the California Institute of Technology

List Price: $20.00 USD
New From: $11.81 USD In Stock
Used from: $8.74 USD In Stock

At 5:20 in the afternoon on 9/11, Building 7 of the World Trade Center collapsed, even though it had not been struck by a plane and had fires on only a few floors. The reason for its collapse was considered a mystery. In August 2008, NIST (the National Institute of Standards and Technology) issued its report on WTC 7, declaring that “the reason for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery” and that “science is really behind what we have said.” Showing that neither of these claims is true, David Ray Griffin demonstrates that NIST is guilty of the most serious types of scientific fraud: fabricating, falsifying, and ignoring evidence. He also shows that NIST’s report left intact the central mystery: How could a building damaged by fire–not explosives–have come down in free fall?

“David Ray Griffin has provided a comprehensive dismantling of NIST’s theory about WTC 7, according to which it suffered global collapse because of ordinary building fires. Besides showing that NIST committed massive scientific fraud, Griffin also points out that NIST was able to complete its theory only by affirming a miracle: a steel-framed high-rise building coming down in free fall even though explosives had not been used to remove its columns.”–Richard Gage, member of American Institute of Architects; founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

“A definitive study of what happens when political concerns are permitted to override science and the scientific method. With intellectual finesse worthy of a scientist, Griffin shows that NIST’s WTC 7 report has no scientific credibility. A must read for all concerned with the restoration of science to its `rightful place’ in our democracy.”–John D. Wyndham, Ph.D., Physics, Cambridge University; former Research Fellow at the California Institute of Technology

9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA


See larger image

Additional Images:

9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA


By (author): Webster Griffin Tarpley

The authoritative work on 9/11 and state-sponsored false-flag terrorism. 9/11 Synthetic Terror is the only book to present a working model for the event – a network of moles, patsies, paramilitary pros, privatized intelligence assets and corrupt media corporations. We see how this enormous provocation was successfully executed and exploited as war propaganda.

This new, fifth edition reveals a whole new dimension of explosive facts for the first time: the enormous array of drills in which the US defense apparatus rehearsed every aspect of the 9/11 operation. Author Webster Tarpley presents the corpus of 9/11 research – such as the controlled demolition of the three WTC towers – from the perspective of a veteran intelligence expert and historian. The exploit is placed in the geopolitical context of oligarchy and imperialism – in the tradition of precedents such as the Gunpowder Plot, the USS Maine, the Strategy of Tension, and other historically decisive state-sponsored terror subterfuges.

List Price: $19.95 USD
New From: $12.53 USD In Stock
Used from: $11.49 USD In Stock

The authoritative work on 9/11 and state-sponsored false-flag terrorism. 9/11 Synthetic Terror is the only book to present a working model for the event – a network of moles, patsies, paramilitary pros, privatized intelligence assets and corrupt media corporations. We see how this enormous provocation was successfully executed and exploited as war propaganda.

This new, fifth edition reveals a whole new dimension of explosive facts for the first time: the enormous array of drills in which the US defense apparatus rehearsed every aspect of the 9/11 operation. Author Webster Tarpley presents the corpus of 9/11 research – such as the controlled demolition of the three WTC towers – from the perspective of a veteran intelligence expert and historian. The exploit is placed in the geopolitical context of oligarchy and imperialism – in the tradition of precedents such as the Gunpowder Plot, the USS Maine, the Strategy of Tension, and other historically decisive state-sponsored terror subterfuges.

Cognitive Infiltration: An Obama Appointee’s Plan to Undermine the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory


See larger image

Additional Images:

Cognitive Infiltration: An Obama Appointee’s Plan to Undermine the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory


By (author): David Ray Griffin

Former Chicago and Harvard law professor Cass Sunstein, who in 2009 was appointed by President Barack Obama to direct an important executive branch office, had in 2008 co-authored an article containing a plan for the government to prevent the spread of anti-government conspiracy theories, in which he advocated the use of anonymous government agents to engage in cognitive infiltration of these groups in order to break them up. In his new book, Griffin focuses on the fact that Sunsteins primary target is the conspiracy theory advocated by the 9/11 Truth Movement. Examining Sunsteins charge that this theory is both harmful and demonstrably false, Griffin uses both satire and overwhelming evidence to show that this twofold charge applies instead to what Sunstein calls the true conspiracy theory about 9/11namely, the theory that al-Qaeda was responsible for 9/11.
List Price: $18.00 USD
New From: $8.20 USD In Stock
Used from: $0.22 USD In Stock

Griffin’s meritorious effort to raise public awareness and understanding

Former Chicago and Harvard law professor Cass Sunstein, who in 2009 was appointed by President Barack Obama to direct an important executive branch office, had in 2008 co-authored an article containing a plan for the government to prevent the spread of anti-government “conspiracy theories.” Arguing that such theories are believed only by groups suffering from “informational isolation,” he advocated the use of anonymous government agents to engage in “cognitive infiltration” of these groups in order to introduce “cognitive diversity,” with the aim of breaking them up.

Noting that Sunstein’s proposal has evoked condemnations from across the political spectrum–not least because it, being similar to the FBI’s COINTELPRO of the 1960s, would be illegal–David Ray Griffin focuses on the fact that Sunstein’s primary target is the conspiracy theory advocated by the 9/11 Truth Movement. Examining Sunstein’s charge that this theory is both “harmful” and “demonstrably false,” Griffin uses both satire and overwhelming evidence to show that this twofold charge applies instead to what Sunstein calls “the true conspiracy theory” about 9/11-namely, the “theory that Al-Qaeda was responsible for 9/11.”

9/11 Ten Years Later: When State Crimes Against Democracy Succeed


See larger image

Additional Images:

9/11 Ten Years Later: When State Crimes Against Democracy Succeed


By (author): David Ray Griffin

9/11 Ten Years Later is David Ray Griffin s tenth book about 9/11. Asking in the first chapter whether 9/11 justified the war in Afghanistan, he explains why it did not.

In the following three chapters, devoted to the destruction of the World Trade Center, Griffin asks why otherwise rational journalists have endorsed miracles (understood as events that contradict laws of science). Also, introducing the book s theme, Griffin points out that 9/11 has been categorized by some social scientists as a state crime against democracy.

Turning next to debates within the 9/11 Truth Movement, Griffin reinforces his claim that the reported phone calls from the airliners were faked, and argues that the intensely debated issue about the Pentagon whether it was struck by a Boeing 757 is quite unimportant.

Finally, Griffin suggests that the basic faith of Americans is not Christianity but nationalist faith which most fundamentally prevents Americans from examining evidence that 9/11 was orchestrated by U.S. leaders and argues that the success thus far of the 9/11 state crime against democracy need not be permanent.

List Price: $20.00 USD
New From: $11.72 USD In Stock
Used from: $7.28 USD In Stock

9/11 Ten Years Later is David Ray Griffin s tenth book about 9/11. Asking in the first chapter whether 9/11 justified the war in Afghanistan, he explains why it did not.

In the following three chapters, devoted to the destruction of the World Trade Center, Griffin asks why otherwise rational journalists have endorsed miracles (understood as events that contradict laws of science). Also, introducing the book s theme, Griffin points out that 9/11 has been categorized by some social scientists as a state crime against democracy.

Turning next to debates within the 9/11 Truth Movement, Griffin reinforces his claim that the reported phone calls from the airliners were faked, and argues that the intensely debated issue about the Pentagon whether it was struck by a Boeing 757 is quite unimportant.

Finally, Griffin suggests that the basic faith of Americans is not Christianity but nationalist faith which most fundamentally prevents Americans from examining evidence that 9/11 was orchestrated by U.S. leaders and argues that the success thus far of the 9/11 state crime against democracy need not be permanent.

The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé


See larger image

Additional Images:

The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé


Features: Used Book in Good Condition
By (author): David Ray Griffin

In 2004, David Ray Griffin published The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11. Translated into several languages, it helped spark a worldwide movement demanding “9/11 truth.” Even as it became increasingly outdated, it continued to be widely cited as the best introduction to the issues.

Griffin has now written The New Pearl Harbor Revisited, which provides a chapter-by-chapter updating of the information provided in that earlier book. It shows that the case against the official account constructed by independent researchers—who now include architects, engineers, physicists, pilots, politicians, and former military officers—is far stronger than it was in 2004, leaving no doubt that 9/11 was a false-flag operation, designed to give the Bush-Cheney administration a pretext to attack oil-rich Muslim nations.

Taken together, these two books provide everything one needs to make an informed decision about 9/11—whether one is a journalist, a political leader, a religious leader, or an ordinary citizen concerned about truth, democracy, and the rule of law.

List Price: $25.00 USD
New From: $13.94 USD In Stock
Used from: $2.69 USD In Stock

In 2004, David Ray Griffin published The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11. Translated into several languages, it helped spark a worldwide movement demanding “9/11 truth.” Even as it became increasingly outdated, it continued to be widely cited as the best introduction to the issues.

Griffin has now written The New Pearl Harbor Revisited, which provides a chapter-by-chapter updating of the information provided in that earlier book. It shows that the case against the official account constructed by independent researchers—who now include architects, engineers, physicists, pilots, politicians, and former military officers—is far stronger than it was in 2004, leaving no doubt that 9/11 was a false-flag operation, designed to give the Bush-Cheney administration a pretext to attack oil-rich Muslim nations.

Taken together, these two books provide everything one needs to make an informed decision about 9/11—whether one is a journalist, a political leader, a religious leader, or an ordinary citizen concerned about truth, democracy, and the rule of law.

Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive?


See larger image

Additional Images:

Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive?


Features: Used Book in Good Condition
By (author): David Ray Griffin

The US s political discourse and foreign policy in recent years has been based on the assumption that Osama bin Laden is still alive. George W. Bush promised as president that he would get Osama bin Laden dead or alive and has been widely criticized for failing to do so. The US s present military escalation in Afghanistan is said to be necessary to get Osama bin Laden. The news media regularly announce the appearance of new messages from bin Laden. But what if Osama bin Laden died in December 2001 which is the last time a message to or from him was intercepted?

In this book, David Ray Griffin examines the evidence for the claim made by everyone from former CIA agent Robert Baer to Oliver North that bin Laden is surely no longer with us. He analyzes the purported messages from bin Laden and finds that, as many have suspected, they do not provide evidence of bin Laden s existence after 2001. This leads naturally to the question: if Osama bin Laden did indeed die in 2001, how and why have dozens of messages from bin Laden appeared since then?

Griffin s meticulous analysis supports above all one simple and urgent conclusion: if Osama bin Laden is dead, the US should not be using its troops and treasure to hunt him down.

List Price: $15.00 USD
New From: $6.99 USD In Stock
Used from: $0.01 USD In Stock

The US s political discourse and foreign policy in recent years has been based on the assumption that Osama bin Laden is still alive. George W. Bush promised as president that he would get Osama bin Laden dead or alive and has been widely criticized for failing to do so. The US s present military escalation in Afghanistan is said to be necessary to get Osama bin Laden. The news media regularly announce the appearance of new messages from bin Laden. But what if Osama bin Laden died in December 2001 which is the last time a message to or from him was intercepted?

In this book, David Ray Griffin examines the evidence for the claim made by everyone from former CIA agent Robert Baer to Oliver North that bin Laden is surely no longer with us. He analyzes the purported messages from bin Laden and finds that, as many have suspected, they do not provide evidence of bin Laden s existence after 2001. This leads naturally to the question: if Osama bin Laden did indeed die in 2001, how and why have dozens of messages from bin Laden appeared since then?

Griffin s meticulous analysis supports above all one simple and urgent conclusion: if Osama bin Laden is dead, the US should not be using its troops and treasure to hunt him down.

9/11 Contradictions: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press

In 9/11 Contradictions, David Ray Griffin shows that the official story about 9/11 is riddled with internal contradictions. Two contradictory statements cannot both be true. These contradictions show, therefore, that individuals and agencies articulating the official story of 9/11 have made many false statements. Congress and the press clearly should ask which of the contradictory statements are false and why they were made.

This book is purely factual, simply laying out the fact that these internal contradictions exist. As such, the book contains no theory. Politicians and journalists who deal with the issues raised herein, therefore, will not be giving credence to some “conspiracy theory” about 9/11. They will simply be carrying out their duty to ask why the official story about 9/11, arguably the most fateful event of our time, is riddled with so many contradictions.

The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions

With US political leaders Democrat and Republican alike rushing to embrace the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission, and an eager media receiving the Commission’s 567-page report as the whole story, the history we can stand upon forevermore, everyone who cares about the fate of American democracy will want to know something about what those pages actually say.

The Commission’s account, by popular reckoning, has made an impression with its heft, its footnotes, its portrayal of the confusion of that sobering day, its detail, its narrative finesse. Yet under the magnifying glass of David Ray Griffin, eminent theologian and author of The New Pearl Harbor (a book that explores questions that reporters, eyewitnesses, and political observers have raised about the 9/11 attacks), the report appears much shabbier. In fact, there are holes in the places where detail ought to be thickest: Is it possible that Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld has given three different stories of what he was doing the morning of September 11, and that the Commission combines two of them and ignores eyewitness reports to the contrary? Is it possible that the man in charge of the military that day, Acting Head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Myers, saw the first tower hit on TV, and then went into a meeting, where he remained unaware of what was happening for the next 40 minutes? Is it possible, as the Commission reports, that the FAA did not inform military that the fourth airplane appeared to have been hijacked-contrary to both common sense and the word of FAA employees? Is it possible that the Report, upon which are based recommendations for overhauling the nation’s intelligence, fails to mention even in a footnote the most serious allegations made public by Coleen Rowley, FBI whistleblower and Time person of the year?

David Ray Griffin’s critique of the Kean-Zelikow report makes clear that our nation’s highest leaders have told tales that wear extremely thin when held up to the light of other eyewitness reports, research, and the dictates of common sense-and that the Commission charged with the task of investigating all of the facts surrounding 9/11 has succeeded in obscuring, rather than unearthing, the truth.

9/11 Predicted On Episode of Lone Gunmen

Six months before 9/11, an episode of the Lone Gunmen, which aired on FOX, depicted a rogue faction within the government remotely hijacking a commercial airliner to fly it into the World Trade Center under the cover of war games and as a pretext to boost the military industrial complex. The star of the show, Dean Haglund, has even gone public suggesting that the CIA dropped the script on the producer of the show. What this does is serve as a discrediting mechanism, because when somebody suggests that scenario really took place on 9/11 itself, as evidence suggests, people can say that person got it from a movie. So depicting 9/11 on a television show before 9/11 fictionalizes the truth.

See:

Experts See F.B.I. Missteps Hampering Anthrax Inquiry

In this article, we are told about the government having the Ames strain of anthrax destroyed which would make it harder to trace the anthrax used in the attack back to its origin. We also learn in this article that, somehow, the way to “prevent” terrorism would be for the FBI to tap lawyer-client conversations. That would more likely allow the FBI to manage patsies. The only way it would help solve the anthrax attack is if the FBI tapped Dick Cheney’s conversations with all of his aides and lawyers.

See: http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/09/us/nation-challenged-inquiry-experts-see-fbi-missteps-hampering-anthrax-inquiry.html

Bin Laden family allowed 9/11 leave

Right after 9/11, while nobody else could fly because flights were grounded, bin Laden family members were allowed to fly out of the country. It seems to me that normal police work would involve questioning the relatives of the person who allegedly carried out the worst terror attack on U.S. soil in history.

See: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2003/09/02/Bin_Laden_family_allowed_911_leave/UPI-37121062555254/

See: http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Bin-Laden-s-relatives-made-a-first-class-escape-2859127.php

Career Army Specialist sues Rumsfeld, Cheney, saying no evacuation order given on 9/11

I understand a Specialist is most likely not somebody who has spent a career in the military, but I use the title straight from the article and that’s besides the point. The issue is that the Pentagon wasn’t evacuated despite the FAA notifying NEADS of incoming aircraft around 15 minutes before impact. While the Pentagon wasn’t evacuated, the National Reconnaissance Office, the agency which operates surveillance satellites and could have maybe actually seen what hit the Pentagon, was evacuated. In what way did the evacuation of NRO impact our surveillance capabilities that morning?

See: http://rawstory.com/news/2008/911_survivor_blasts_Rumsfeld_Cheney_No_1217.html

See: http://expose911.com/u-s-agencys-strange-9ll-coincidence/

Expose 9/11 © 2015 Frontier Theme