Why question 9/11?

This website was just launched on June 1st, 2015. Over the next several days and weeks, I will be adding links and resources to this website to make a compelling case that we were lied to about 9/11. I have came to that conclusion with a heavy heart.

I’ve had questions about the events of 9/11 since almost the morning of 9/11. I pay attention to, and read about, current events. Information surrounding 9/11 was revealed on a piecemeal basis and some of the information would prompt questions.

Being informed has not been beneficial or advantageous to me. I have gained and benefited nothing by questioning 9/11. To the contrary, since many people would rather accept the government’s official story, I have probably lost career opportunities. At the same time, knowing what I know, I would be intellectually dishonest to not question the official 9/11 story.

At times, I have had my motives called into question. I’ve had my patriotism called into question, yet I question 9/11 because I care about my country. I have been called names – at times, by my own family. I am not ashamed for speaking truth. I am not ashamed for opposing murdering terrorists. That’s why I decided to create this website.

This is meant to be a simple to navigate website that will offer links and resources to help you understand why I question 9/11 and why you should question 9/11 as well. I answer some common points of attack on efforts to expose 9/11 truth.

As an example, people like to use the term “conspiracy theorist” in a derogatory way, applying the term exclusively to those who question the official story about 9/11. But unless you believe mother nature brought down the World Trade Center on 9/11, then you, too, are a conspiracy theorist. Why? The official story is a conspiracy theory – i.e., the theory that rebels from caves in Afghanistan conspired to knock down the World Trade Center.

No. I don’t blame everybody in government. There are some bad people and there are good people in government. One refrain I have heard is there is no way the government – or, more precisely, an element embedded within the government – could have done 9/11 without everybody knowing about it, and to say that 9/11 was an inside job would require blaming the entire government.

That refrain is totally wrong. If you believe 19 amateurs could have done 9/11, why would it be impossible to believe that a different group of 19 men, embedded within the most powerful government on earth, couldn’t have done 9/11?

Furthermore, the refrain that 9/11 couldn’t have been an inside job because people would have known is wrong. Good people and whistleblowers in government have came forward, so there are people who know that what we have been told about 9/11 isn’t true.

I didn’t ask to be in the position of questioning 9/11. I do not enjoy having questions about 9/11. I ended up in this position because my own personal circumstances in juxtaposition with my conscience and love for my country compel me to question 9/11.

How so? I served for four years on active duty in the Marine Corps infantry honorably. Shortly before my End of Active Service date, which was in June of 1999, I had to receive the first three shots of the anthrax vaccine series. My unit’s policy was to make us take the shots even if we were about to get out.

I was so close to getting out of the Marine Corps when I had to receive the anthrax vaccine that two out of three of the shots I received were administered posterior to my final physical. There’s nothing in my military medical records about health problems from the anthrax vaccine. I didn’t get out on a medical. I received a very nice letter of recommendation from my Company First Sgt.

I was planning on re-enlisting in the Reserves right off of active duty, but my First Sgt. wanted me to re-enlist on active duty. In a spirit of friendliness, my First Sgt. gave me a difficult time about going to see the career planner to re-enlist in the Reserves. I decided I would re-enlist after coming home while still in the Individual Ready Reserves. But my treatment from the VA medical system prompted me to abandon the idea altogether.

Right as I got out of the Marine Corps, I ended up with health problems that began just posterior to receiving the anthrax vaccine. The Department of Veterans Affairs medical system has not only not been helpful, but has been an obstacle in getting those health problems treated. The VA medical system has lied about me in a plurality of instances – some of the lies more serious than others – and never corrected those lies as far as I’m aware. I have had to go outside of the VA medical system to get my health problems treated. The VA is a criminal organization.

I am far from the only one who has endured problems from the anthrax vaccine. Because of the damage that vaccine was inflicting on the health of the troops, the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program was halted in the year 2000. I devoted a great portion of my life to exposing the dangers of that vaccine because I care about those serving in the military. It has been a thankless effort, as no good deed goes unpunished.

Because of my experience with the anthrax vaccine, I have followed the developments of the anthrax attack very closely. How many people even remember the anthrax attack and are cognizant of the anthrax attack that took place adjacent to 9/11?

That anthrax attack was used as the pretext to rejuvenate the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program. Yet it turns out, pursuant to the government’s own story, the culprit was a Department of Defense scientist who worked on the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program named Bruce Ivins.

But there’s something else. If you look more closely at the anthrax attack, you would find a nexus between the anthrax attack and 9/11. If those two are, indeed, nexused with one another, which I believe I can demonstrate, then that should prompt a question: How is it the anthrax attack was, admittedly, an inside job, but 9/11 wasn’t? See: http://expose911.com/category/evidence-and-anomalies/anthrax-attack/

I do not run around saying that 9/11 was an inside job lightly nor for effect. I don’t say it because I like to complain. I don’t say it because I’m angry. I say it because I believe it to be true. I believe it to be true because I have taken time to look at and analyze information very carefully. At the same time, I want only the truth. If the truth were that Osama bin Laden is responsible for 9/11, I would accept that.

Given my personal experiences, I’m uncertain how anybody could expect me to not have questions about 9/11. And if 9/11 was an inside job – not incompetence, but misfeasance – what, other than calling for accountability, is the most moral and appropriate response? Therefore, I call for the prompt arrest and prosecution of all 9/11 perpetrators, whoever they may be. Any others who have played a role in obstructing justice by covering up 9/11 must also be held accountable. If that means President Barack Obama as well as President George W. Bush be arrested for the sake of justice, then so be it. I’m opposed to amnesty for war criminals. I’m opposed to Washington, D.C., being a sanctuary city for mega criminals.

As a Christian, I have a duty to stand for truth. Failing to stand for truth would make me complicit in a lie. There is no in between God and the Devil. If you are not for God, then you are for the Devil. I choose God. I refuse to suppress the truth in unrighteousness. I choose compassion over indifference. I care about humanity.

I believe that as I add links and information to this site, you, too, will find reason to question 9/11. And if 9/11 was an inside job, then it is our duty to alert our fellow countrymen.

When I enlisted in the Marine Corps, I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution. That oath means something to me. Only by exposing who the real terrorists are can we prevent future acts of terrorism. The only way to end the terror program peacefully is not by self-censoring, but by speaking truth. We should be prepared at all times to defend our beliefs by getting 9/11 truth in order. The machinations of tyranny must be exposed and thrown off. That’s why I put this website together.

Did the FBI sabotage the Amerithrax investigation?

Pursuant to the FBI agent in charge of the Amerithrax investigation, Richard Lambert, FBI leadership impeded the investigation and stove piped the flow of information. Why would the FBI have sabotaged the Amerithrax investigation?

See: http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/04/18/anthrax-coverup-exposed-paul-craig-Roberts/

See: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/04/head-fbis-anthrax-investigation-calls-b-s.html

See: http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1714250-former-fbi-special-agent-in-charge-richard.html

Experts See F.B.I. Missteps Hampering Anthrax Inquiry

In this article, we are told about the government having the Ames strain of anthrax destroyed which would make it harder to trace the anthrax used in the attack back to its origin. We also learn in this article that, somehow, the way to “prevent” terrorism would be for the FBI to tap lawyer-client conversations. That would more likely allow the FBI to manage patsies. The only way it would help solve the anthrax attack is if the FBI tapped Dick Cheney’s conversations with all of his aides and lawyers.

See: http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/09/us/nation-challenged-inquiry-experts-see-fbi-missteps-hampering-anthrax-inquiry.html

Rudy Giuliani goes to Florida to decontaminate building

Of all the people in the world, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani got the contract to decontaminate the building that was hit with anthrax. One of the first things the government did after the anthrax attack was order all of the Ames strain of anthrax destroyed, which would have made it much harder to do genetic testing in order to determine the origin of the anthrax that was used in the attack. Was Giuliani there to decontaminate the building or help destroy evidence?

See: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/giuliani-co-cleaning-up-anthrax/

See: http://www.heraldtribune.com/news/20040114/giuliani-firm-to-occupy-fla-anthrax-building

See: http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2004-01-14/news/0401140190_1_ami-building-brentwood-postal-facility-giuliani-partners

See: http://www.giulianipartners.com/press_bioone_011304.aspx

Larry Klayman on the White House being on Cipro

Larry Klayman, himself a former Department of Justice official, believes the White House had foreknowledge of the anthrax attack. Keep in mind the attack was allegedly carried out by a scientist in the employ of the government pursuant to the government itself. And let me make clear that the White House didn’t take the anthrax shots, but was on the antibiotic Cipro before the anthrax attack.

See: http://www.newsgarden.org/columns/anthrax/cipro.shtml

The hijackers had no way of knowing about the tabloid connection

On this one you need to scroll down and read the remarks about how the alleged hijackers had no way of knowing about the nexus between the lady who rented them apartments and the tabloid paper that was hit by anthrax. This prompts the question: Who selected the targets? I don’t believe it was Bruce Ivins who selected those targets.

See: http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=gloria_irish_1

Since this was posted, that page was taken down, so you have to see the archived page.

See: http://web.archive.org/web/20140730183712/http://historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=gloria_irish_1

Hijackers linked to tabloid

The information contained in this article is key, because it contains the nexus between the anthrax attack and the 9/11 attack. Keep in mind that the anthrax attack took place after 9/11, which means, following the government’s own conspiracy theory, the alleged hijackers were all dead. But I would say the mistake is to assume that what we’ve been told about 9/11 was true and that there were indeed hijackers.

Like I’ve said over and over, if the anthrax attack was an inside job – which it was pursuant to the government itself – and if it was nexused with 9/11, then how was 9/11 not an inside job?

I believe that when all the information is collected and amalgamated, the only scenario that makes sense is the alleged hijackers were patsies and that the planes were remotely piloted drones.

This article tells us that one of the targets that was hit by anthrax in Florida was a building occupied by a media publication edited by a man whose wife rented apartments to the alleged hijackers. The government calls it a big “coincidence”. If it wasn’t a “coincidence”, then there’s a problem – a major problem.

See: http://www.sptimes.com/News/101501/Worldandnation/Hijackers_linked_to_t.shtml

See: http://edition.cnn.com/2001/HEALTH/conditions/10/15/anthrax.hijackers/

See: http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/attack/2001/10/15/anthrax-wife.htm

See: http://www.foxnews.com/story/2001/10/15/tabloid-editor-wife-rented-apartments-to-two-hijackers.html