Expose 9/11

Because 9/11 Was An Inside Job

Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive?

The US s political discourse and foreign policy in recent years has been based on the assumption that Osama bin Laden is still alive. George W. Bush promised as president that he would get Osama bin Laden dead or alive and has been widely criticized for failing to do so. The US s present military escalation in Afghanistan is said to be necessary to get Osama bin Laden. The news media regularly announce the appearance of new messages from bin Laden. But what if Osama bin Laden died in December 2001 which is the last time a message to or from him was intercepted?

In this book, David Ray Griffin examines the evidence for the claim made by everyone from former CIA agent Robert Baer to Oliver North that bin Laden is surely no longer with us. He analyzes the purported messages from bin Laden and finds that, as many have suspected, they do not provide evidence of bin Laden s existence after 2001. This leads naturally to the question: if Osama bin Laden did indeed die in 2001, how and why have dozens of messages from bin Laden appeared since then?

Griffin s meticulous analysis supports above all one simple and urgent conclusion: if Osama bin Laden is dead, the US should not be using its troops and treasure to hunt him down.

9/11 Contradictions: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press

In 9/11 Contradictions, David Ray Griffin shows that the official story about 9/11 is riddled with internal contradictions. Two contradictory statements cannot both be true. These contradictions show, therefore, that individuals and agencies articulating the official story of 9/11 have made many false statements. Congress and the press clearly should ask which of the contradictory statements are false and why they were made. This book is purely factual, simply laying out the fact that these internal contradictions exist. As such, the book contains no theory. Politicians and journalists who deal with the issues raised herein, therefore, will not be giving credence to some conspiracy theory about 9/11. They will simply be carrying out their duty to ask why the official story about 9/11, arguably the most fateful event of our time, is riddled with so many contradictions.

Cognitive Infiltration: An Obama Appointee’s Plan to Undermine the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory

Former Chicago and Harvard law professor Cass Sunstein, who in 2009 was appointed by President Barack Obama to direct an important executive branch office, had in 2008 co-authored an article containing a plan for the government to prevent the spread of anti-government conspiracy theories, in which he advocated the use of anonymous government agents to engage in cognitive infiltration of these groups in order to break them up. In his new book, Griffin focuses on the fact that Sunsteins primary target is the conspiracy theory advocated by the 9/11 Truth Movement. Examining Sunsteins charge that this theory is both harmful and demonstrably false, Griffin uses both satire and overwhelming evidence to show that this twofold charge applies instead to what Sunstein calls the true conspiracy theory about 9/11namely, the theory that al-Qaeda was responsible for 9/11.

The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False

At 5:20 in the afternoon on 9/11, Building 7 of the World Trade Center collapsed, even though it had not been struck by a plane and had fires on only a few floors. The reason for its collapse was considered a mystery. In August 2008, NIST (the National Institute of Standards and Technology) issued its report on WTC 7, declaring that “the reason for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery” and that “science is really behind what we have said.” Showing that neither of these claims is true, David Ray Griffin demonstrates that NIST is guilty of the most serious types of scientific fraud: fabricating, falsifying, and ignoring evidence. He also shows that NIST’s report left intact the central mystery: How could a building damaged by fire–not explosives–have come down in free fall?

“David Ray Griffin has provided a comprehensive dismantling of NIST’s theory about WTC 7, according to which it suffered global collapse because of ordinary building fires. Besides showing that NIST committed massive scientific fraud, Griffin also points out that NIST was able to complete its theory only by affirming a miracle: a steel-framed high-rise building coming down in free fall even though explosives had not been used to remove its columns.”–Richard Gage, member of American Institute of Architects; founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

“A definitive study of what happens when political concerns are permitted to override science and the scientific method. With intellectual finesse worthy of a scientist, Griffin shows that NIST’s WTC 7 report has no scientific credibility. A must read for all concerned with the restoration of science to its `rightful place’ in our democracy.”–John D. Wyndham, Ph.D., Physics, Cambridge University; former Research Fellow at the California Institute of Technology

9/11 Ten Years Later: When State Crimes Against Democracy Succeed

9/11 Ten Years Later is David Ray Griffin s tenth book about 9/11. Asking in the first chapter whether 9/11 justified the war in Afghanistan, he explains why it did not.

In the following three chapters, devoted to the destruction of the World Trade Center, Griffin asks why otherwise rational journalists have endorsed miracles (understood as events that contradict laws of science). Also, introducing the book s theme, Griffin points out that 9/11 has been categorized by some social scientists as a state crime against democracy.

Turning next to debates within the 9/11 Truth Movement, Griffin reinforces his claim that the reported phone calls from the airliners were faked, and argues that the intensely debated issue about the Pentagon whether it was struck by a Boeing 757 is quite unimportant.

Finally, Griffin suggests that the basic faith of Americans is not Christianity but nationalist faith which most fundamentally prevents Americans from examining evidence that 9/11 was orchestrated by U.S. leaders and argues that the success thus far of the 9/11 state crime against democracy need not be permanent.

The New Pearl Harbor Revisited: 9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé

In 2004, David Ray Griffin published The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11. Translated into several languages, it helped spark a worldwide movement demanding “9/11 truth.” Even as it became increasingly outdated, it continued to be widely cited as the best introduction to the issues.

Griffin has now written The New Pearl Harbor Revisited, which provides a chapter-by-chapter updating of the information provided in that earlier book. It shows that the case against the official account constructed by independent researchers—who now include architects, engineers, physicists, pilots, politicians, and former military officers—is far stronger than it was in 2004, leaving no doubt that 9/11 was a false-flag operation, designed to give the Bush-Cheney administration a pretext to attack oil-rich Muslim nations.

Taken together, these two books provide everything one needs to make an informed decision about 9/11—whether one is a journalist, a political leader, a religious leader, or an ordinary citizen concerned about truth, democracy, and the rule of law.

The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11

Taking to heart the idea that those who benefit from a crime ought to be investigated, here the eminent theologian David Ray Griffin sifts through the evidence about the attacks of 9/11 – stories from the mainstream press, reports from abroad, the work of other researchers, and the contradictory words of members of the Bush administration themselves – and finds that, taken together, they cast serious doubt on the official story of that tragic day

Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory

By virtue of his previous four books on the subject, David Ray Griffin is widely recognized as one of the leading spokespersons of the 9/11 truth movement, which rejects the official conspiracy theory about 9/11. Although this movement was long ignored by the US government and the mainstream media, recent polls have shown that the rejection of the official theory has become a mainstream political phenomenon. No longer ignoring the 9/11 truth movement, the government and the corporately controlled media have released a flurry of stories and reports aimed at debunking it. In the present book, David Ray Griffin shows that these attempts can themselves be easily debunked. Besides demonstrating the pitiful failure of Debunking 9/11 Myths (published by Popular Mechanics and endorsed by Senator John McCain), Griffin riddles recent reports and stories put out by the US Department of State, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the New York Times, and others. He responds to criticisms of these efforts and shows that the charge that is regularly leveled against critics of the official theory–that they employ irrational and unscientific methods to defend conclusions based on faith–actually applies more to those who defend the official theory.

The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions

With US political leaders Democrat and Republican alike rushing to embrace the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission, and an eager media receiving the Commission’s 567-page report as the whole story, the history we can stand upon forevermore, everyone who cares about the fate of American democracy will want to know something about what those pages actually say.

The Commission’s account, by popular reckoning, has made an impression with its heft, its footnotes, its portrayal of the confusion of that sobering day, its detail, its narrative finesse. Yet under the magnifying glass of David Ray Griffin, eminent theologian and author of The New Pearl Harbor (a book that explores questions that reporters, eyewitnesses, and political observers have raised about the 9/11 attacks), the report appears much shabbier. In fact, there are holes in the places where detail ought to be thickest: Is it possible that Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld has given three different stories of what he was doing the morning of September 11, and that the Commission combines two of them and ignores eyewitness reports to the contrary? Is it possible that the man in charge of the military that day, Acting Head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Myers, saw the first tower hit on TV, and then went into a meeting, where he remained unaware of what was happening for the next 40 minutes? Is it possible, as the Commission reports, that the FAA did not inform military that the fourth airplane appeared to have been hijacked-contrary to both common sense and the word of FAA employees? Is it possible that the Report, upon which are based recommendations for overhauling the nation’s intelligence, fails to mention even in a footnote the most serious allegations made public by Coleen Rowley, FBI whistleblower and Time person of the year?

David Ray Griffin’s critique of the Kean-Zelikow report makes clear that our nation’s highest leaders have told tales that wear extremely thin when held up to the light of other eyewitness reports, research, and the dictates of common sense-and that the Commission charged with the task of investigating all of the facts surrounding 9/11 has succeeded in obscuring, rather than unearthing, the truth.

Why Question 9/11?

This website was just launched on June 1st, 2015. Over the next several days and weeks, I will be adding links and resources to this website to make a compelling case that we were lied to about 9/11. I have came to that conclusion with a heavy heart.

I’ve had questions about the events of 9/11 since almost the morning of 9/11. I pay attention to, and read about, current events. Information surrounding 9/11 was revealed on a piecemeal basis and some of the information would prompt questions.

Being informed has not been beneficial or advantageous to me. I have gained and benefited nothing by questioning 9/11. To the contrary, since many people would rather accept the government’s official story, I have probably lost career opportunities. At the same time, knowing what I know, I would be intellectually dishonest to not question the official 9/11 story.

At times, I have had my motives called into question. I’ve had my patriotism called into question, yet I question 9/11 because I care about my country. I have been called names – at times, by my own family. I am not ashamed for speaking truth. I am not ashamed for opposing murdering terrorists. That’s why I decided to create this website.

This is meant to be a simple to navigate website that will offer links and resources to help you understand why I question 9/11 and why you should question 9/11 as well. I answer some common points of attack on efforts to expose 9/11 truth.

As an example, people like to use the term “conspiracy theorist” in a derogatory way, applying the term exclusively to those who question the official story about 9/11. But unless you believe mother nature brought down the World Trade Center on 9/11, then you, too, are a conspiracy theorist. Why? The official story is a conspiracy theory – i.e., the theory that rebels from caves in Afghanistan conspired to knock down the World Trade Center.

No. I don’t blame everybody in government. There are some bad people and there are good people in government. One refrain I have heard is there is no way the government – or, more precisely, an element embedded within the government – could have done 9/11 without everybody knowing about it, and to say that 9/11 was an inside job would require blaming the entire government.

That refrain is totally wrong. If you believe 19 amateurs could have done 9/11, why would it be impossible to believe that a different group of 19 men, embedded within the most powerful government on earth, couldn’t have done 9/11?

Furthermore, the refrain that 9/11 couldn’t have been an inside job because people would have known is wrong. Good people and whistleblowers in government have came forward, so there are people who know that what we have been told about 9/11 isn’t true.

I didn’t ask to be in the position of questioning 9/11. I do not enjoy having questions about 9/11. I ended up in this position because my own personal circumstances in juxtaposition with my conscience and love for my country compel me to question 9/11.

How so? I served for four years on active duty in the Marine Corps infantry honorably. Shortly before my End of Active Service date, which was in June of 1999, I had to receive the first three shots of the anthrax vaccine series. My unit’s policy was to make us take the shots even if we were about to get out.

I was so close to getting out of the Marine Corps when I had to receive the anthrax vaccine that two out of three of the shots I received were administered posterior to my final physical. There’s nothing in my military medical records about health problems from the anthrax vaccine. I didn’t get out on a medical. I received a very nice letter of recommendation from my Company First Sgt.

I was planning on re-enlisting in the Reserves right off of active duty, but my First Sgt. wanted me to re-enlist on active duty.  In a spirit of friendliness, my First Sgt. gave me a difficult time about going to see the career planner to re-enlist in the Reserves. I decided I would re-enlist after coming home while still in the IRR. But my treatment from the VA medical system prompted me to abandon the idea altogether.

Right as I got out of the Marine Corps, I ended up with health problems that began just posterior to receiving the anthrax vaccine. The Department of Veterans Affairs medical system has not only not been helpful, but has been an obstacle in getting those health problems treated. The VA medical system has lied about me in a plurality of instances – some of the lies more serious than others – and never corrected those lies as far as I’m aware. I have had to go outside of the VA medical system to get my health problems treated. The VA is a criminal organization.

I am far from the only one who has endured problems from the anthrax vaccine. Because of the damage that vaccine was inflicting on the health of the troops, the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program was halted in the year 2000. I devoted a great portion of my life to exposing the dangers of that vaccine because I care about those serving in the military. It has been a thankless effort, as no good deed goes unpunished.

Because of my experience with the anthrax vaccine, I have followed the developments of the anthrax attack very closely. How many people even remember the anthrax attack and are cognizant of the anthrax attack that took place adjacent to 9/11?

That anthrax attack was used as the pretext to rejuvenate the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program. Yet it turns out, pursuant to the government’s own story, the culprit was a Department of Defense scientist who worked on the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program named Bruce Ivins.

But there’s something else. If you look more closely at the anthrax attack, you would find a nexus between the anthrax attack and 9/11.  If those two are, indeed, nexused with one another, which I believe I can demonstrate, then that should prompt a question: How is it the anthrax attack was, admittedly, an inside job, but 9/11 wasn’t? See: http://expose911.com/category/evidenceandanomalies/anthraxattack/

I do not run around saying that 9/11 was an inside job lightly nor for effect. I don’t say it because I like to complain. I don’t say it because I’m angry. I say it because I believe it to be true. I believe it to be true because I have taken time to look at and analyze information very carefully. At the same time, I want only the truth. If the truth were that Osama bin Laden is responsible for 9/11, I would accept that.

Given my personal experiences, I’m uncertain how anybody could expect me to not have questions about 9/11. And if 9/11 was an inside job – not incompetence, but misfeasance – what, other than calling for accountability, is the most moral and appropriate response? Therefore, I call for the prompt arrest and prosecution of all 9/11 perpetrators, whoever they may be. Any others who have played a role in obstructing justice by covering up 9/11 must also be held accountable. If that means President Barack Obama as well as President George W. Bush be arrested for the sake of justice, then so be it. I’m opposed to amnesty for war criminals. I’m opposed to Washington, D.C., being a sanctuary city for mega criminals.

As a Christian, I have a duty to stand for truth. Failing to stand for truth would make me complicit in a lie. There is no in between God and the Devil. If you are not for God, then you are for the Devil. I choose God. I refuse to suppress the truth in unrighteousness. I choose compassion over indifference. I care about humanity.

I believe that as I add links and information to this site, you, too, will find reason to question 9/11. And if 9/11 was an inside job, then it is our duty to alert our fellow countrymen.

When I enlisted in the Marine Corps, I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution. That oath means something to me. Only by exposing who the real terrorists are can we prevent future acts of terrorism. The only way to end the terror program peacefully is not by self-censoring, but by speaking truth. We should be prepared at all times to defend our beliefs by getting 9/11 truth in order. The machinations of tyranny must be exposed and thrown off. That’s why I put this website together.

Expose 9/11 © 2016 Frontier Theme